NERF 2019 Review

We announced in July this year that we had taken the difficult decision to cancel the 2020 Raptor Conference due to be hosted by the two Peak District raptor groups in November.

Even without the second COVID 19, lockdown, we could not see an acceptable way to safeguard the conference attendees in a manner that enabled the conference to be popular success we have become accustomed to. Not least of which is the social side of the event, which many of our conference attendees consider to be important as the informative and entertaining presentations.

In any event the second lockdown, announced at the end of October, would have led to short notice cancellation and this risk alone meant that an early cancellation was the most sensible thing to do.

The initial lockdown at the start of spring 2020, will undoubtedly have influenced fieldwork and data that will feature in the 2020 report (to be published in 2021), it does not mean that the 2019 report could not go ahead. This did create some difficulties, namely how would we manage the distribution of a hard copy and recovering the cost of producing the report, the conference being key to both these issues in the past.

The solution we have settled on is to produce a downloadable reduced content 2019 report Whilst we are hopeful that the global Covid pandemic will have been brought to an end as the vaccines become available, at the present time we feel that it would be wise to be cautious in predicting what the future will hold for us during 2021. We will of course continue to update as the situation unfolds.

The 2019 report can be downloaded here. (or click the image below)

Stay safe and thank you for your continued support. Hopefully we will be able to gather together again at the NERF 2021 Conference.

NERF 21st November 2020

Click to download

Dryad joins the ‘disappeared’. From ‘tree spirit’ to dead in 90 days.

Dryad was a female Hen Harrier that was satellite tagged on 7 June this year in the Forest of Bowland. She was named in celebration of Dryad, the tree spirit who resembled a woman in Greek mythology, and she fledged a few days later. As with many of the other missing Hen Harriers, NERF members were involved with locating and monitoring her nest then ringing and satellite tagging her. The fact that Dryad has joined the ‘disappeared’ weighs heavy on the people involved.

The type of satellite tag fitted to Dryad is extremely reliable and prior to going off-line her satellite tag was functioning perfectly for three months. There are several descriptions of tag failures in these circumstances including ‘sudden stop’, ‘stopped, no malfunction’ and ‘catastrophic failure’, no matter how the failure is described they all trigger a land search in the area of the last know fix [LKF]. There is a function within the tag that continues to work after contact with the satellite is lost allowing a dead bird to be found. Highly trained RSPB Investigations staff, using very sophisticated equipment, searched the area, however perhaps not unexpectedly, the bird was not located. No matter how the inexplicable tag stoppage is described it means the same thing; Dryad has joined the ‘disappeared’, never to be seen again. Another young Hen Harrier’s life snuffed out in North Yorkshire. She had spent less than 3 months flying free. Free as a bird.

Whilst the matter has been reported to the Police we know that investigating this type of incident is notoriously difficult. Consequently, it is highly unlikely that there will be a successful outcome to their enquiries.

How unpredictably, cruelly prophetic would her name be? According to the satellite data her last know fix [LKF] was on the border of Cumbria and Yorkshire, just inside the Yorkshire Dales National Park. Whilst the LKF provided a What3Words location we can’t reveal the position of that 3m2 block where the tag failed because it is not NERF’s data to reveal. The words could be, perhaps should be, Dryad / 90-days / disappeared. Sadly those three words are closer than you may think to the actual What3Words.

Map showing the approximate location of Hen Harrier Dryad’s last known fix.

Dryad was the 44th satellite tagged Hen Harrier to join the ‘disappeared’ in the last 2 years. Where does that leave the shooting industry’s representative’s claim that they have zero tolerance of raptor persecution? Really, where is the evidence to justify that claim? Other than warm words there is a distinct lack of evidence to support it.

The RSPB press release was published on 15 September and a check of the leading shooting industry websites during the morning of 16 September revealed the extent of their public declaration for their zero tolerance policy:

  • The Moorland Association reminds us that it has been ‘a record breaking year for Hen Harrier breeding’ but there was nothing about Dryad
  • The National Gamekeepers Association mentions the 2020 Hen Harrier breeding success but there was nothing about Dryad
  • BASC, in common with the other industry’s websites, has plenty of advice about Covid-19 but there was nothing about Dryad
  • Countryside Alliance also carries the month old story that 2020 was a good year for breeding Hen Harriers but there was no mention of Dryad.

There have been ongoing discussions with the shooting industry representatives for years, in various forums, that are supposed to be attempts to address the continuing problem of Hen Harrier persecution, yet to date nothing has been achieved. Hen Harriers remain at risk, continuing to face oblivion as a breeding species in England. You will read countless words from the shooting industry about the improvement in breeding success in 2020, however these numbers are merely a snapshot from one year. Whilst NERF welcomes this increase in breeding success it is not a future predictor of population expansion.

Perhaps the industry’s press officers are overwhelmed at the moment by the urgent need to update their websites informing their members that the Covid-19 ‘mingling rule’ does not apply to them and shooting can carry on as normal in this time of a ‘new normal’. Perhaps they haven’t had time to write something about Dryad yet. Perhaps they will write something today. Then again perhaps they won’t.

Dryad was the 44th satellite tagged Hen Harrier to join the ‘disappeared’ in the last 2 years. Where does that leave Natural England’s Hen Harrier Action Plan? How many birds have to die or inexplicably ‘disappear’ before they admit that their Plan isn’t working? Without changes to legislation, the licencing of game shooting and rigid law enforcement nothing will change. Why is Natural England continuing with their Hen Harrier brood management scheme?

The Moorland Association et al are leading proponents of Brood Management claiming that it provides a ‘a safety net’ for the grouse shooting industry and builds trust which in turn will ensure that raptor persecution will not be necessary. The concept of building trust between criminals and conservationists who represent potential victims is alien to most people. The belief that the Brood Management concept would achieve the proffered result was naive at best, at worst the whole idea was ridiculous, it is not achieving the stated aim and should be abandoned with immediate effect.

Persecution is the most significant threat to Hen Harriers which, despite claims to the contrary, continues to face extinction as a breeding species in England. We know that to be the case because Natural England have told us so in 2 of their own published papers. In 2008 Natural England published a paper in which they said; “There is compelling evidence that persecution continues, both during and following the breeding season.” The paper went on to say “Persecution continues to limit Hen Harrier recovery in England”. [A future for the Hen Harrier in England 2008.]. After that pronouncement nothing changed over the next decade and in 2019 Murgatroyd et al used Natural England’s data and published ‘Patterns of satellite tagged hen harrier disappearances suggest widespread illegal killing on British grouse moors’.

These two papers and continued criminal behaviour by some members of the shooting community are very instructive. The economist John Maynard Keynes famously said, ‘When the facts change, I change my mind’. The facts have changed and continue to change. It is time for the senior managers in Natural England who are wedded to Brood Management to read their own data, abandon the Brood Management Scheme and start to repair the reputational damage that it is doing to the organisation.


16 September 2020

NERF’s response to the 2020 Hen Harrier breeding data published by Natural England.

Hen Harrier nest

The published Hen Harrier breeding data for 2020 has been heralded as a huge success in some quarters, but was it? There has been much back slapping from Natural England’s senior management, the Moorland Association, GWCT and BASC et al. Congratulations are offered all round with the claim that the Hen Harrier Action Plan is working. Cue brass band.

There has indeed been an increase in both the number of successful nests and the number of fledglings and this is to be welcomed. Sixty young from 19 successful nests; 3.2 fledglings per nest is within the range that we would have expected in a year when the weather in June was very favourable. Interestingly in the Natural England press release Tony Juniper is quoted as saying “2020 has seen the best breeding season for England’s hen harriers in years………………” but he fails to mention that there were actually 24 breeding attempts during 2020, 5 of which failed. We will return to this later. According to Natural England’s own data there were 23 breeding attempts in both 2003 and 2007 [A future for the Hen Harriers in England 2008]. Therefore an increase from 23 to 24 isn’t very much to celebrate and doing so is a classic example of ‘Shifting Baseline Syndrome’. The collapse of the Hen Harrier population has been accepted in some quarters, and welcomed in others, as the inevitable, unassailable consequence of the purported conflict between driven grouse shooting and Hen Harriers for decades. Society, including those members who have a duty to protect Hen Harriers, has come to accept a population range between 1% and 5% [3 – 15 pairs] of its agreed potential, is the acceptable norm. Therefore any increase beyond 15 pairs, no matter how small, is seen as something to be celebrated. It is not. If we are to achieve the goal of allowing the Hen Harrier population to increase in proportion with the available, suitable habitat then ‘Shifting Baseline Syndrome’ must be avoided.

Whilst the numbers are an improvement on recent years we shouldn’t get carried away with that. What we should be celebrating is that 330 pairs fledged 3.2 chicks per nest in England, not 19. One thousand chicks entering the population; imagine that. Unfortunately, imagining that prospect is probably all that many of us will ever be able to do. Interestingly, whilst a BASC statement welcomes the increase and acknowledges that there is much to do it also goes on to say “This figure means we are only 30 per cent of the way towards a sustainable English breeding hen harrier population”. If that comment accurately reflects BASC’s position and they are indeed suggesting that 20 nests represents 30% of a self-sustaining population then are they also implying that the English Hen Harrier population of 66 pairs is acceptable. Acceptable to whom? Is that their target population? Sixty-six pairs is only one-fifth of the projected carrying capacity in England.

Other than there being enough breeding birds in the population to raise young, the most important fact leading to increased productivity is prey availability. We know that in 2020 there was a ‘vole plague’ i.e. a plentiful and consistent food supply throughout the breeding season, in some of the breeding areas. The consistent availability of prey and in some cases the provision of supplementary / diversionary feeding understandably led to increased productivity. However, the situation will undoubtedly be reversed in future years when prey availability crashes and / or the demand for the provision of diversionary feeding exceeds the capacity to deliver it, either financially or physically.

Natural England claims that 2020 was a record year, however productivity is only a measure of breeding success. Survivability is the measure of population expansion. In the past according to the analysis of Natural England’s data 72% of satellite tagged birds were killed or very likely to have been killed on a grouse moor. Their landmark paper also revealed that Hen Harriers are likely to die or inexplicably disappear without trace was 10 times higher, yes 10 times higher, on grouse moors when compared to none grouse moors. “Patterns of satellite tagged hen harrier disappearances suggest widespread illegal killing on British grouse moors”. Murgatroyd et al 2019. We won’t know for 1 or 2 years whether or not 2020 was a good year for Hen Harriers. Knowing that 72% of satellite tagged birds are killed or likely to have been killed on grouse moors it is not unreasonable to suggest that 72% of un-tagged birds suffered the same fate.

By making small assumptions and rounding the numbers to make the calculations less technical and using Murgatroyd et al as a base, we can predict what the final outcome will be for the 2020 cohort. Starting with 60 chicks, assuming that 32 were tagged we can predict that 75%, 24 individuals, will be killed or assumed to have been killed on grouse moors. Presuming that 75%, an additional 24 individuals, of the un-tagged birds were also killed or believed to have been killed on grouse moors during the same period, a total of 48 birds joined the ‘disappeared’ during the first year. The 12 remaining chicks, 20% of the original cohort, are not immune from dying and an unknown number will succumb to natural causes. The final number of chicks surviving their first year will depend largely on the availability of prey and the ferocity of the winter but is likely to be less than 12. Before people attempt to ridicule these calculations as ‘back of an envelope’ speculation they should read data published by Natural England in 2019. That data looked at 58 chicks and predicted that only 17%, less than 10 individuals would survive their first year. A very similar outcome to the one we predict for 2020.

The exact proportion of birds being killed or assumed to have been killed on grouse moors, revealed by Murgatroyd et al, may have come as a shock to some but the fact that persecution remains a limiting factor to population expansion is well documented and should not have come as a surprise. In 2008 Natural England published a paper in which they said; “There is compelling evidence that persecution continues, both during and following the breeding season.” The paper went on to say “Persecution continues to limit Hen Harrier recovery in England”. [A future for the Hen Harrier in England 2008.]

Natural England have produced two documents that unequivocally state that persecution is the primary problem limiting Hen Harrier population expansion. However, in Natural England’s latest press release Tony Juniper is quoted as saying “Although persecution is thought to be the main factor limiting hen harrier numbers in England”. At what point did Natural England’s evidence based statements that persecution is the main issue limiting population expansion become a ‘thought experiment’?

NERF is a member of the Raptor Persecution Priority Delivery Group [RPPDG], and as such is a consultee under Action 4 of NE’s Hen Harrier Recovery Plan. The paper can be found at . Yet when Natural England went in search of supporting comments for their press release they only published comments from the shooting industry. Perhaps Natural England would like to explain why that was the case. They may also want to explain why NERF wasn’t included in the list of organisations working in partnership for the benefit of Hen Harriers.

NERF is at the forefront of Hen Harrier nest finding and monitoring during the breeding season, ringing, satellite tagging and winter roost monitoring in partnership with the RSPB. Despite this, we weren’t approached for a comment when Natural England published their press release. If we had been asked for and provided a comment we doubt that it would have been published. Natural England should be in no doubt that without the dedication of NERF members who commit hundreds of voluntary hours to monitoring and self-fund thousands of miles to monitor Hen Harriers the species would be in a much worse state than it is currently.

NERF is also concerned that the press release failed to acknowledge that there were in fact 24 active nests at the start of the breeding season. Two nests were being provisioned by a polygamous male and when he joined the ‘disappeared’ both nests were understandably abandoned. Two other nests, both of which were known to contain eggs, failed during the Covid-19 lockdown period when conservation staff and volunteers were prohibited from monitoring nests. There is every possibility that these 4 nests failed as a result of persecution and yet they don’t even warrant a mention in the press release. The 5th nest appears to have failed due to predation. Why didn’t Natural England, the Moorland Association or GWCT mention these failures in their statements? Were they attempting to bury bad news rather than being upfront and transparent by publishing all of the nest data in their press release?

Before the celebrations get out of hand we need to take a closer look at land ownership and usage and overlay that with the breeding data. Only by doing that can we develop a new understanding of the breeding success and its relationship with driven grouse shooting in 2020.

The shooting industry are claiming credit for the success because some of the nests were located on grouse moors. However, how relevant was that claim? How many of the 19 successful nests were actually successful solely on the basis that they nested on land managed for grouse shooting and for no other reason? The Moorland Association tell us that the answer is 12, more than 63%. That sounds impressive, but a closer look at the data suggests that when all other factors are considered it is not as impressive as the press release would have us believe.

In reality two nests were brood managed and they should be deducted from the Moorland Association’s claim on the basis that the young from these nests were raised in captivity, not on a grouse moor. Additionally the remaining nests in those brood managed clusters should also be deducted because they were required to be protected as part of the brood management scheme.

Four of the remaining nests were in the South Pennine SPA on United Utilities land in the Forest of Bowland, albeit it with a shooting tenant, and where therefore afforded special protection. Of the remaining nests, 1 nest was on a hill farm with a shooting tenant and both the farmer and tenant were unconcerned that the pair were breeding and both were actively supporting the local Raptor Workers who were monitoring the nest.

Whilst we accept that land with grouse shooting interests can be loosely classed as a grouse moor it should only be done so in the context that the landowner has control over the property. The tenant will be bound by contractual obligations which may include complying with current legislation and face the risk that the contract will be terminated in the event of a breach.

The remaining nest was located on what Raptor Workers and raptor conservationists would recognise as a private, traditional driven grouse moor. The nest was monitored from over the fence line by NERF members and the owner was aware of this.

The spin free results are not as impressive as we were led to believe. Why does Natural England’s senior management and the shooting industry representatives feel that it is necessary to use spin in this way? The data shows an increase, not staggeringly so, but an increase non-the-less. Of course the shooting industry will insist that whilst the primary land use may not be grouse shooting the land is managed for that purpose and the management techniques used benefit all ground nesting birds, including Hen Harriers. The discussion about the alleged benefits of grouse moor land management is for another day.

Before the celebrations begin we need to see the brood management scheme abandoned and year on year increases in both breeding success and chick survivability on land that is primarily used for grouse shooting. Those are the only measures that we should be using to quantify success. It is only when Hen Harriers are breeding on private grouse moors across the whole of the northern uplands that we may allow ourselves a little optimism for the future of a species that remains in peril.

Sorry brass band you can stand down. The fanfare has been cancelled for this year, again, and we won’t be keeping your number on speed dial for the time being at least.


11 September 2020

Northern England Raptor Forum – Annual Conference 2020 cancelled.

It is with regret that we have to announce that the NERF Annual Conference planned for November 2020 has been cancelled. The effects of Covid-19 pandemic continue to disrupt daily life and threaten the health and well-being of people throughout the country.

NERF has a duty of care to our members and supporters, many of whom are in the vulnerable age group, and we have taken this decision to ensure the safety of delegates, speakers and venue staff is not put at risk.

We can now look forward to meeting again at the next conference in November 2021. In the meantime enjoy birding over the next few months and stay safe.

NERF 13 July 2020

Another day in the Peak District National Park and another shot raptor

WARNING– This article contains a photograph of a Buzzard with horrific injuries.








This is yet one more example of how intolerant some members of society are towards Birds of Prey. This Buzzard was found by a member of the public who then telephoned the RSPB Investigations Team. The bird was subsequently taken to a veterinary surgeon by one of the Investigation Officers. Unfortunately the injuries sustained by the bird were so severe that it had to be euthanised.

When a post mortem was carried out it transpired that the Buzzard had been shot on a previous occasion and had survived only to be shot a second time.









The northern Peak District is a well-known blackspot for the shooting, trapping and poisoning of birds of prey. In 2018, a rock climber witnessed a Red Kite being shot near Saddleworth and later in the year a Tawny Owl and a Short-eared Owl were found shot near Wessenden Head.

If you have any information relating to this incident:

  • contact Greater Manchester Police on 101
  • you can contact Crimestoppers anonymously telephone 0800 555111.
  • if you find a wild bird of prey which you suspect has been illegally killed, contact RSPB Investigations on 01767 680551


8 June 2020

Lockdown, the ‘New Normal’ and raptor crime

Poisoned Buzzard featured in the Channel 4 news item on raptor persecution

During the last three months the way that we live our lives has changed enormously and the phrase ‘New Normal’ is widely used by politicians, the media and the public when discussing the impact of the Covid – 19 pandemic. This ‘New Normal’ is how our lives will be affected for the foreseeable future. Regrettably if you were a bird of prey then for you lockdown could be described as ‘New Normal – Plus’.

We have witnessed high levels of raptor persecution, often associated with the game shooting industry, for decades and at times many of us believed that it couldn’t get any worse. How wrong we were. At the start of the Covid – 19 lockdown, which NERF supported, we warned that the level of bird of prey crime was likely to increase exponentially. It brings no comfort to realise that we were correct when making that prediction; not that it was difficult to predict an increase in persecution because we had seen a similar outcome during the Foot and Mouth crisis in 2001.

The seriousness of the problem was highlighted in a Channel 4 broadcast

Five dead buzzards are pulled from a hole where they’d been hidden on a grouse shooting estate in Bransdale, North York Moors National Park

During the program Matt Hagen, Head of the North Yorkshire Police Rural Crime Team said, “All the shooting investigations that we’ve got going on at the moment are involving gamekeepers on grouse moors.”

The BBC’s flagship rural affairs programme ‘Countryfile’ also highlighted the increase in raptor persecution during lockdown

The subject was raised again on the BBC local news program ‘Look Northwest’ (unfortunately the BBC Look Northwest links only last 24 hours so we can’t share this with you). During the program Howard Jones, RSPB Investigations Officer, said “Lockdown has kind of emboldened the criminals out there who want to kill birds of prey so they think with the restrictions that have been imposed there’ll be less people out in the countryside and there’s less chance of being caught”. He added, “In two thirds of the prosecutions that have ended up in court for bird of prey persecution since 1990, two thirds of those have been gamekeepers”.

If you are reading this article and were previously unaware of the level of bird of prey persecution these two statements, by very experienced investigators, tells you all you need to know about the criminality involved. It’s serious and organised crime in any meaning of the phrase.

There is ample evidence, reams of evidence, that some members of the game shooting industry form an ever present threat to birds of prey and yet the representatives of the industry continue to trot out endless statements of denial. During the Look Northwest exposé Duncan Thomas, the Northwest Director of BASC, said: “I really dispute these figures [number of raptors killed]. I would love to have a proper investigation in to exactly where they’re coming from. The RSPB are using birds of prey as a cash cow. It’s not proportionate, effective investigation, we must let the police get on with their job. We will expel anybody who is convicted of a wildlife crime of this nature”.

This is an outrageous statement from a Director of BASC, an organisation that is a member of the Police led Raptor Persecution Priority Delivery Group [RPPDG]. Rather than supporting the RSPB, the organisation which ironically is cleaning up the shooting industry, something that the industry is failing to do, by revealing the organised crime involved in some sections of the business, the industry continues to attack the hard working, dedicated and highly skilled RSPB Investigations Team.

Is the claim that the RSPB is “using birds of prey as a cash cow” BASC policy? Is it what the majority of their law-abiding members believe or has Mr Thomas gone rogue? The name RSPB spells out very clearly what its purpose is, i.e. to protect birds and that includes investigating the unlawful killing of birds. Would Mr Thomas, or BASC, make the same ridiculous statement about Victim Support, a charity set up to protect the human victims of crime? The ‘cash cow’ statement is ludicrous and will be seen as such by the general public, including, no doubt, many BASC members.

Interestingly on the BASC website Gary Doolan, Deputy Director of Communications and Public Affairs makes the following comment “For both programmes [Channel 4 and Look Northwest], BASC worked with other organisations in the background to ensure the messages we deliver to the audiences of those programmes are balanced and best represent the broad sweep of opinions within those organisations”.

There is a second comment on the BASC website that refers to the same subject “……………that hen harriers are being weaponised as a ‘cash cow’.

Perhaps the comment, made by Mr Thomas, that “The RSPB are using birds of prey as a cash cow” is BASC’s position statement after all.

Not content with attacking the integrity of the RSPB, some representatives of the shooting industry have previously launched despicable personal attacks on Chief Inspector Louise Hubble, Head of the National Wildlife Crime Unit and Superintendent Nick Lyall, the dynamic head of the RPPDG.

Attacks on Nick’s integrity are not new. The shooting industry representatives collectively walked out en masse when Nick brought additional conservation organisations in to the RPPDG. If the RPPDG is so bad, why did they all re-join? Perhaps the more pertinent question is, why were they allowed to return to the table? Constructive criticism is always welcome; however the constant attempt to undermine the RPPDG is intolerable.


8 June 2020

The country may have been in lockdown but in the countryside the killing fields were still open for business as usual.

On Friday 17 April 2020 the satellite tagged Red Kite named ‘KK’ joined the long list of raptors that have ‘disappeared’ on a grouse moor in the North of England. The Police were informed and the location of the last known fix was thoroughly searched using sophisticated tracking equipment. Unfortunately, as we have seen so many times before when a tag stops with no traceable malfunction once again the body was not recovered.

On 1 May we asked – Is the Red Kite named ‘KK’ Covid – 19 collateral damage?

Red Kite named ‘KK’ in tribute to one the FoRK volunteers







As soon as the lockdown was announced we were immediately concerned that there would be an upsurge in raptor persecution. This was not an unreasonable assumption, many of us had seen a similar pattern during the Foot and Mouth crisis during 2001.

Now that travel restrictions have been lifted and our members are back on the ground it is clear that persecution has been widespread. Breeding attempts that were recorded prior to the lockdown have failed. Breeding territories that have held birds for years are empty and there is a long list of proven persecution cases being dealt with by the Police.

In a recent press release issued by the RSPB, Mark Thomas Head of Investigations said,

“Since lockdown began, the RSPB has been overrun with reports of birds of prey being targeted. It is clear that criminals on some sporting estates both in the uplands and lowlands, have used the wider closure of the countryside as an opportunity to ramp up their efforts to kill birds of prey.”

The full press release, including a comment by Superintendent Nick Lyall, Chair of the Raptor Persecution Priority Delivery Group, can be seen here.

It is abundantly clear that whilst the general population was complying with the Government’s advice to ‘stay home and stay safe’ the wildlife criminals carried on killing. Just another day in the countryside; business as usual and there will undoubtedly be many more cases of Covid – 19 collateral damage to our bird of prey populations in the coming weeks.

Further information in relation to raptor persecution and the Police response can be found here. click the link to Operation Owl.

If you have any information about raptor persecution, or any other Wildlife crime please contact the Police on 101, or,

Crimestoppers on 0800 555111.

Alternatively, you can call the RSPB’s confidential Raptor Crime Hotline on 0300 999 0101.


16 May 2020

Licences to take wild Peregrine chicks – Part 2

On the 15th April 2020 Dave Slater, Director for wildlife licensing confirmed that Natural England had licenced the removal of 6 Peregrine chicks from the wild, by three individuals, over the next 2 years. [see here]

Understandably both Raptor Workers, who are committed to monitoring and protecting these magnificent birds, and members of the public who delight in seeing the masters of the skies in both wild places and our cities. NERF was dismayed by this decision and posted this response on the NERF website.

On the 20th April 2020 NERF wrote to Lord Goldsmith of Richmond, the Minister of State for the Pacific and the Environment. His portfolio includes the UK environment and conservation. In the letter we reminded him that the country was currently in lockdown as a result of the Covid – 19 pandemic and that the BTO has, understandably, suspended all Wildlife and Countryside licences and ringing permits for the foreseeable future. These restrictions apply to England’s rarest and most endangered species. At the same time Natural England has licenced the removal of 6 Peregrine chicks from the wild. It is NERF’s opinion that this is both unreasonable and irresponsible at the present time. The removal of these chicks cannot be classed as ‘front-line work’ and the multiple journeys to and from the nests cannot be classed as ‘essential’ under the Corona Virus Regulations.

Accessing Peregrine nests is a dangerous activity and an accident and subsequent rescue would put unnecessary stress on both the rescue and medical services. The British Mountaineering Council [BMC] has warned climbers and hill walkers to curtail their activities during the pandemic and that the Mountain Rescue Teams are also in lockdown and unavailable in case of an accident.

NERF has called on Lord Goldsmith to suspend the licences during 2020. The full text of the letter can be read [here]

Similarly we wrote to Tony Juniper, Chairman of natural England. The full text of the letter can be read [here]

Twelve days later neither Lord Goldsmith nor Mr Juniper have responded to our letters. Time is pressing and we await their responses.


2 May 2020

Is the Red Kite named ‘KK’ Covid – 19 collateral damage?








On Friday 17 April 2020 the Red Kite ‘KK’ joined the long list of raptors that have ‘disappeared’– on a grouse moor.

In June 2019 NERF members, the Friends of Red Kites [FoRK] based in the North East of England, arranged for a Red Kite chick to be fitted with a satellite tracking device. The chick was named ‘KK’ in tribute to one the FoRK volunteers. The bird was also fitted with wing tags bearing the ID number 00, one of which can be seen in the photograph. After the tag was fitted the data it provided was monitored and mapped by the RSPB.

Red Kites are extremely placid birds of prey, a delight to handle as chicks and a beautiful graceful bird to watch gliding across open country. They are largely carrion feeders, scavenging on dead animals, cleaning up the countryside. They do not pose a threat to the shooting industry and yet in some quarters they are vilified for the sole reason that they a member of the raptor family.

During the remainder of 2019 KK toured the North of England as far south as the Peak District before returning to the Derwent Valley, Tyne & Wear.

In common with our extensive experience of other satellite tagged birds, KK’s life followed a pattern that we have seen with all too regularly. The tag worked perfectly and then without the warning signs that we would expect to see from a tag that is nearing its natural end of life the transmission suddenly and inexplicably stopped.

That the last fix, prior to the ‘stop no malfunction’ located the bird on a grouse moor near the Derwent Reservoir, in County Durham. Despite an extensive ground search being carried out by a very experienced team, using sophisticated equipment, the body was not found. These facts will not come as a surprise to those of us who follow these cases closely. Natural England’s Hen Harrier data reveals that satellite tagged birds are 10 times more likely to ‘disappear’ when the tag fails without warning when the bird was on a grouse moor at the time [Murgatroyd et al]. Data already in the public domain indicates that Hen Harrier chicks satellite tagged as part of the RSPB’s Hen Harrier Life Project reveal a similar pattern.

This is not the first Red Kite to ‘disappear’ in the Derwent Gorge area and the quote from Harold Dobson, spokesman for the Friends of the Red Kites, tell us all we need to know:

“Since 2010, seven red kites have been found poisoned or shot near the Derwent Gorge and surrounding Durham Moorland. We fear that this may be the tip of the iceberg and that many more persecuted kites are never found.”

David Raw representing NERF member, the Durham Upland Bird Study Group, has commented:-

“The abrupt loss of an otherwise reliable signal from this carefully tracked bird is of great concern. The original Northern Kites release project and later our colleagues in Friends of Red Kites have all worked tirelessly to establish a viable population of these magnificent birds in our region. Local success has brought pleasure, pride and enjoyment within the community but expansion of the breeding range is now overdue. The loss of this bird in suspicious circumstances, in the same area as other known persecution incidents of Red Kites, reflects an appalling situation and is surely indicative of how selfish criminal activity is holding back the population.”

From the moment that the Government announced the Covid – 19 lockdown Raptor Workers have been expressing concern that raptor persecution would increase significantly after we were, for understandable reasons, prevented from surveying and monitoring birds of prey. This is not an unreasonable fear, we saw a similar pattern in 2001 when access to the countryside was banned during the Foot and Mouth outbreak.

Is KK Covid – 19 collateral damage, or was this bird already destined to join the long line of birds that have ‘disappeared’ on grouse moors irrespective of the current pandemic?

The RSPB press release can be seen here [link]

If you have any information about this incident, please contact the Police on 101, quoting the reference number 22042020-0078., or,

Crimestoppers on 0800 555111.

Alternatively, if you have information about this case or of other birds of prey being killed or targeted you can call the RSPB’s confidential Raptor Crime Hotline on 0300 999 0101.


1 May 2020